China’s Military Strategy: We will « Counterattack » if Attacked

On May 26, China’s official press agency Xinhua headlined « China rolls out military roadmap of ‘active defense’ strategy, » saying:

An official white paper issued by the State Council Information Office titled « China’s Military Strategy » pledged « closer international security cooperation. »

It stressed « the principles of defense, self-defense and post-emptive strike. » It said China isn’t aggressive. It will « counterattack » if attacked.

Focus will be placed on « winning informationized local wars. » International security cooperation will be stressed « in areas crucially related to overseas interests. »

Four « critical security domains » were highlighted – « ocean, outer space, cyberspace and nuclear force. »

China’s navy will defend offshore and « open seas » waters. Cybersecurity will be prioritized.

Beijing opposes weaponizing space. It « vowed to secure its space assets. » It pledged no nuclear arms race with other countries.

It stressed a commitment to world peace and stability. It won’t « pursue military expansion. »

It fundamentally opposes hegemonism and power politics in all forms. It faces multiple complex security threats – including « illegal, military presence on China’s territory, and outside parties involving themselves in South China Sea affairs, » a clear reference to US regional meddling.

Beijing considers US South China Sea surveillance flights unacceptable provocations. The Pentagon admits flying its most advanced P-8A-Poseidon spy plane regularly in the area – monitoring Beijing activities primarily.

A May 25 state-run Global Times editorial bluntly warned:

« If the United States’ bottom line is that China has to halt its activities, then a US-China war is inevitable in the South China Sea. »

« China will have no choice but to engage » in response to US provocations. Beijing’s waters are its own. Its message says it won’t tolerate US intervention where it doesn’t belong.

China is concerned about America’s increasing Asia/Pacific presence as well as Japan’s intent on « overhauling its military and security policies » cooperatively with Washington.

« (A)nti-China forces have never given up their attempt to instigate a color revolution » against Beijing, the white paper said. The risk of potential conflict is real.

Hawkish US senators want a comprehensive anti-China strategy adopted. In a letter to Defense Secretary Carter, they said « longstanding interests of the United States, as well as our allies and partners, stand at considerable risk. »

They want Beijing challenged in its own part of the world – perhaps belligerently. On the one hand, they slam China’s legitimate military presence in its own territory.

On the other, they ignore menacing US bases, nuclear-armed navy and tens of thousands of US combat troops close to China’s borders – a direct threat to its security.

Last week, US Pacific Command (PACOM) hosted military officials from 22 Asia/Pacific countries in Hawaii. China notably was excluded.

A symposium discussed amphibious military strategies, tactics and capabilities. A US marines amphibious assault demonstration was featured.

Washington aims to integrate amphibious operations with Pacific area nations and ally them against China’s growing regional strength and influence.

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said Washington may expand military patrols in Pacific rim waters – including around China’s Spratly Archipelago land reclamation project involving construction of artificial islands atop coral reefs.

US Pacific fleet commander Admiral Harry Harris accused Beijing of building a « great wall of sand » in disputed waters.

He claimed « the scope and pace of building man-made islands raises serious questions about Chinese intentions. »

The area involved is 1.5 square miles. « How China proceeds will be a key indicator of whether the region is heading towards confrontation or cooperation. » Harris said.

America’s belligerent presence risks the former. Apparently nothing was learned from lost Korean and Southeast Asian wars.

China justifiably claims the right to build in its own territorial waters – « indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha (Spratly) Islands and adjacent waters, » it says.

Washington has no right to meddle in a part of the world not its own. China’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said America should avoid « risky and provocative approaches to maintain regional peace and stability. »

She stressed China will defend its territorial sovereignty. Unauthorized intrusions will be challenged.

Longstanding US overreach may lead to direct confrontation with China. The risk of potential conflict is real.

Articles Par : Stephen Lendman

A propos :

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected] His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III." Visit his blog site at Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Avis de non-responsabilité : Les opinions exprimées dans cet article n'engagent que le ou les auteurs. Le Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation se dégage de toute responsabilité concernant le contenu de cet article et ne sera pas tenu responsable pour des erreurs ou informations incorrectes ou inexactes.

Le Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation (CRM) accorde la permission de reproduire la version intégrale ou des extraits d'articles du site sur des sites de médias alternatifs. La source de l'article, l'adresse url ainsi qu'un hyperlien vers l'article original du CRM doivent être indiqués. Une note de droit d'auteur (copyright) doit également être indiquée.

Pour publier des articles de en format papier ou autre, y compris les sites Internet commerciaux, contactez: [email protected] contient du matériel protégé par le droit d'auteur, dont le détenteur n'a pas toujours autorisé l’utilisation. Nous mettons ce matériel à la disposition de nos lecteurs en vertu du principe "d'utilisation équitable", dans le but d'améliorer la compréhension des enjeux politiques, économiques et sociaux. Tout le matériel mis en ligne sur ce site est à but non lucratif. Il est mis à la disposition de tous ceux qui s'y intéressent dans le but de faire de la recherche ainsi qu'à des fins éducatives. Si vous désirez utiliser du matériel protégé par le droit d'auteur pour des raisons autres que "l'utilisation équitable", vous devez demander la permission au détenteur du droit d'auteur.

Contact média: [email protected]